Our pass rate is high to 98.9% and the similarity percentage between our JN0-633 study guide and real exam is 90% based on our seven-year educating experience. Do you want achievements in the Juniper JN0-633 exam in just one try? I am currently studying for the Juniper JN0-633 exam. Latest Juniper JN0-633 Test exam practice questions and answers, Try Juniper JN0-633 Brain Dumps First.
♥♥ 2021 NEW RECOMMEND ♥♥
Free VCE & PDF File for Juniper JN0-633 Real Exam (Full Version!)
★ Pass on Your First TRY ★ 100% Money Back Guarantee ★ Realistic Practice Exam Questions
Free Instant Download NEW JN0-633 Exam Dumps (PDF & VCE):
Available on:
http://www.surepassexam.com/JN0-633-exam-dumps.html
Q51. Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit–
-- Exhibit --
You receive complaints from users that their Web browsing sessions keep dropping prematurely. Upon investigation, you find that the IDP policy shown in the exhibit is detecting the users' sessions as HTTP:WIN-CMD:WIN-CMD-EXE attacks, even though their sessions are not actual attacks. You must allow these sessions but still inspect for all other relevant attacks.
How would you configure your SRX device to meet this goal?
A. Create a new security policy that allows HTTP for all users and does not apply IDP.
B. Modify the security policy to add an application exception.
C. Modify the IDP policy to delete this particular attack from the IDP rulebase.
D. Modify the IDP policy to add an exempt rulebase rule to not inspect for this attack.
Answer: D
Q52. Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit --
CID-0:RT: flow process pak fast ifl 71 in_ifp ge-0/0/5.0
CID-0:RT: ge-0/0/5.0:10.0.0.2/55892->192.168.1.2/80, tcp, flag 2 syn
CID-0:RT: find flow: table 0x5a386c90, hash 50728(0xffff), sa 10.0.0.2, da 192.168.1.2, sp 55892, dp 80, proto 6, tok 7
CID-0:RT: no session found, start first path. in_tunnel - 0x0, from_cp_flag - 0 CID-0:RT: flow_first_create_session
CID-0:RT: flow_first_in_dst_nat: in <ge-0/0/5.0>, out <N/A> dst_adr 192.168.1.2, sp 55892, dp 80
CID-0:RT: chose interface ge-0/0/5.0 as incoming nat if.
CID-0:RT:flow_first_rule_dst_xlatE.DST no-xlatE.0.0.0.0(0) to 192.168.1.2(80)
CID-0:RT:flow_first_routinG.vr_id 0, call flow_route_lookup(): src_ip 10.0.0.2, x_dst_ip 192.168.1.2, in ifp ge-0/0/5.0, out ifp N/A sp 55892, dp 80, ip_proto 6, tos 10
CID-0:RT:Doing DESTINATION addr route-lookup
CID-0:RT: routed (x_dst_ip 192.168.1.2) from LAN (ge-0/0/5.0 in 0) to ge-0/0/1.0, Next- hop: 172.16.32.1
CID-0:RT:flow_first_policy_searcH.policy search from zone LAN-> zone WAN (0x0,0xda540050,0x50)
CID-0:RT:Policy lkup: vsys 0 zone(7:LAN) -> zone(6:WAN) scope:0 CID-0:RT: 10.0.0.2/55892 -> 192.168.1.2/80 proto 6
CID-0:RT:Policy lkup: vsys 0 zone(5:Unknown) -> zone(5:Unknown) scope:0 CID-0:RT: 10.0.0.2/55892 -> 192.168.1.2/80 proto 6
CID-0:RT: app 6, timeout 1800s, curr ageout 20s CID-0:RT: packet dropped, denied by policy
CID-0:RT: denied by policy default-policy-00(2), dropping pkt CID-0:RT: packet dropped, policy deny.
CID-0:RT: flow find session returns error.
CID-0:RT: ----- flow_process_pkt rc 0x7 (fp rc -1) CID-0:RT:jsf sess close notify
CID-0:RT:flow_ipv4_del_flow: sess , in hash 32
-- Exhibit --
A host is not able to communicate with a Web server.
Based on the logs shown in the exhibit, what is the problem?
A. A policy is denying the traffic between these two hosts.
B. A session has not been created for this flow.
C. A NAT policy is translating the address to a private address.
D. The session table is running out of resources.
Answer: A
Q53. Which action will allow an administrator to connect in band to an SRX Series device in transparent mode over SSH?
A. Use a VLAN interface.
B. Use the loopback interface.
C. Use a logical interface.
D. Use an irb interface.
Answer: D
Q54. Click the Exhibit button.
[edit security application-firewall] user@host# show
rule-sets web { rule one { match {
dynamic-application junos:HTTP;
}
then { permit;
}
}
default-rule { reject;
}
}
What will happen to non-HTTP traffic that matches the application-firewall policy shown in the exhibit?
A. It will be denied because this is a blacklist policy.
B. It will be dropped and an error will be sent to the source.
C. It will be silently dropped.
D. It will be allowed because this is a whitelist policy.
Answer: C
Q55. What are two intrusion protection mechanisms available on SRX Series Services Gateways? (Choose two.)
A. routing update detection
B. traffic anomaly detection
C. NAT anomaly protection
D. DoS protection
Answer: B,D
Explanation:
Juniper IPS system prevents Traffic Anamoly detection and DoS/DDoS attacks. Reference: http://www.juniper.net/in/en/products-services/software/router-services/ips/
Q56. Click the Exhibit button.
user @host> show bgp summary logical-system LSYS1 Groups : 11 Peers : 10 Down peers: 1
Table Tot. Paths Act Paths Suppressed History Damp State Pending
inet.0 141 129 0 0 0 Peer AS InPkt OutPkt OutQ Flaps Last Up/Dwn State|#Active/Received/Accepted/Damped...
192.168.64.12 65008 11153 11459 0 26 3d
3:10:43 9/10/10/0 0/0/0/0
192.168.72.12 65009 11171 11457 0 26 3d
3:10:39 11/12/12/0 0/0/0/0
192.168.80.12 65010 9480 9729 0 27 3d
3:10:42 11/12/12/0 0/0/0/0
192.168.88.12 65011 11171 11457 0 25 3d
3:10:31 12/13/13/0 0/0/0/0
192.168.96.12 65012 9479 9729 0 26 3d
3:10:34 12/13/13/0 0/0/0/0
192.168.10.12 65013 111689 11460 0 27 3d
3:10:46 9/10/10/0 0/0/0/0
192.168.11.12 65014 111688 11458 0 25 3d
3:10:42 9/10/10/0 0/0/0/0
192.168.12.12 65015 111687 11457 0 25 3d
3:10:38 9/10/10/0 0/0/0/0
192.68.11.12 650168 9478 9729 0 25 3d
3:10:42 9/10/10/0 0/0/0/0
192.168.13.12 65017 111687 11457 0 27 3d
3:10:30 9/10/10/0 0/0/0/0
192.168.16.12 65017 111687 11457 0 27 1w3d2h
Connect
user@host> show interfaces ge-0/0/7.0 extensive
Logical interface ge-0/0/7.0 (Index 76) (SNMP ifIndex 548) (Generation 141)
...
Security: Zone: log
Allowed host-inbound traffic : bootp dns dhcp finger ftp tftp ident-reset http https ike netconf ping reverse-telnet reverse-ssh rloqin rpm rsh snmp
snmp-trap ssh telnet traceroute xnm-clear-text xnm-ssl lsping ntp sip r2cp
Flow Statistics: Flow Input statistics: Self packets: 0
ICMP packets: 0
VPN packets: 0
Multicast packets: 0
Bytes permitted by policy: 0
Connections established: 0 Flow Output statistics: Multicast packets: 0
Bytes permitted by policy: 0
Flow error statistics (Packets dropped due to): Address spoofing: 0
Authentication failed: 0 Incoming NAT errors: 0
Invalid zone received packet: 0 Multiple user authentications: 0 Multiple incoming NAT: 0
No parent for a gate: 0
No one interested in self pakets: 0 No minor session: 0
No more sessions: 589723 No NAT gate: 0
No route present: 0
No SA for incoming SPI: 0 No tunnel found: 0
No session for a gate: 0
No zone or NULL zone binding 0 Policy denied: 0
Security association not active: 0
TCP sequence number out of window: 0 Syn-attack protection: 0
User authentication errors: 0
Protocol inet, MTU: 1500, Generation: 1685, Route table: 0 Flags: Sendbcast-pkt-to-re
Addresses, F1ags: Is-Preferred Is-Primary
Destination: 10.5.123/24, Local: 10.5.123.3, Broadcast: 10.5.123.255, Generation: 156
Protocol multiservice, MTU: Unlimited, Generation: 1686, Route table: 0 Policer: Input: default_arp_policer
...
An SRX Series device has been configured with a logical system LSYS1. One of the BGP peers is down.
Referring to the exhibit, which statement explains this problem?
A. The LSYS license only allows up to ten BGP peerings.
B. The maximum number of allowed flows is set to low.
C. The allocated memory is not sufficient for this LSYS.
D. The minimum number of flows is set to high.
Answer: B
Q57. Click the Exhibit button. [edit]
user@host# show interfaces ge-0/0/1 {
unit 0 {
family bridge { interface-mode access; vlan-id 20;
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 { unit 0 {
family bridge { interface-mode access; vlan-id 20;
}
}
}
[edit]
user@host# show bridge-domains d1 {
domain-type bridge; vlan-id 20;
}
[edit]
user@host# show security flow bridge
[edit]
user@host# show security zones security-zone 12 {
host-inbound-traffic { system-services { any-service;
}
}
interfaces { ge-0/0/1.0; ge-0/0/10.0;
}
}
Referring to the exhibit, which statement is true?
A. Packets sent tom the SRX Series device are sent to the RE.
B. Packets sent to the SRX Series device are discarded.
C. Only frames that have a VLAN ID of 20 are accepted.
D. Only frames that do not have any VLAN tags are accepted.
Answer: C
Q58. Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit–
-- Exhibit --
Based on the output shown in the exhibit, what are two results? (Choose two.)
A. The output shows source NAT.
B. The output shows destination NAT.
C. The port information is changed.
D. The port information is unchanged.
Answer: B,D
Explanation: Reference:http://junos.com/techpubs/software/junos-security/junos-security10.2/junos-security-cli-reference/index.html?show-security-flow-session.html
Q59. You are troubleshooting an IPsec session and see the following IPsec security associations:
ID Gateway Port Algorithm SPI Life:sec/kb Mon vsys
< 192.168.224.1 500 ESP:aes-256/sha1 d6393645 26/ unlim - 0
> 192.168.224.1 500 ESP:aes-256/sha1 153ec235 26/ unlim - 0
< 192.168.224.1 500 ESP:aes-256/sha1 f9a2db9a 3011/ unlim - 0
> 192.168.224.1 500 ESP:aes-256/sha1 153ec236 3011/ unlim - 0
What are two reasons for this behavior? (Choose two.)
A. Both peers are trying to establish IKE Phase 1 but are not successful.
B. Both peers have established SAs with one another, resulting in two IPsec tunnels.
C. The lifetime of the Phase 2 negotiation is close to expiration.
D. Both peers have establish-tunnels immediately configured.
Answer: C,D
Explanation: Reference: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos-es/junos-es93/junos-es-swcmdref/show-security-ipsec-security-associations.html
Q60. -- Exhibit -- [edit]
user@srx# run show route
inet.0: 10 destinations, 10 routes (10 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
0.0.0.0/0 *[Static/5] 01:09:08
> to 172.18.1.1 via ge-0/0/3.0 10.210.14.128/27 *[Direct/0] 8w6d 15:43:09
> via ge-0/0/0.0
10.210.14.135/32 *[Local/0] 11w0d 06:43:04
Local via ge-0/0/0.0
172.18.1.0/30 *[Direct/0] 8w6d 15:43:01
> via ge-0/0/3.0
172.18.1.2/32 *[Local/0] 11w0d 06:43:03
Local via ge-0/0/3.0 172.19.1.0/24 *[Direct/0] 03:46:56
> via ge-0/0/1.0
172.19.1.1/32 *[Local/0] 03:46:56
Local via ge-0/0/1.0 172.20.105.0/24 *[Direct/0] 03:46:56
> via ge-0/0/4.105
172.20.105.1/32 *[Local/0] 03:46:56
Local via ge-0/0/4.105
192.168.30.1/32 *[Direct/0] 4d 03:44:41
> via lo0.0
fbf.inet.0: 2 destinations, 2 routes (2 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both 0.0.0.0/0 *[Static/5] 00:00:11
> to 172.19.1.2 via ge-0/0/1.0 172.19.1.0/24 *[Direct/0] 00:00:11
> via ge-0/0/1.0
[edit]
user@srx# show routing-instances fbf {
routing-options { static {
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 172.19.1.2;
}
}
}
[edit]
user@srx# show routing-options interface-routes {
rib-group inet fbf-int;
}
static {
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 172.18.1.1;
}
rib-groups { fbf-int {
import-rib [ inet.0 fbf.inet.0 ]; import-policy fbf-pol;
}
}
[edit]
user@srx# show policy-options policy-statement fbf-pol term 1 {
from interface ge-0/0/1.0; to rib fbf.inet.0;
then accept;
}
term 2 {
then reject;
}
-- Exhibit --
Referring to the exhibit, you notice that filter-based forwarding is not working. What is the reason for this behavior?
A. The RIB group is configured incorrectly.
B. The routing policy is configured incorrectly.
C. The routing instance is configured incorrectly.
D. The default static routes are configured incorrectly.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Bydefault, wehave a static route in a routing instancesendingthe default route to 172.19.1.2.Wewant to hijack traffic matching a particular filter and send the traffic to a different next-hop, 172.18.1.1. Weshouldcreate your rib group by importing FIRST the table belonging to your virtual router and SECOND the table for the forwarding instancethat has the next-hop specified.
Reference:http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB17223